Facilitators and barriers to implementing lifestyle intervention programme to prevent cognitive decline.

Faculty of Social Sciences (Health Sciences) and Gerontology Research Center (GEREC), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. Department of Public Health and Welfare, Population Health Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Institute of Clinical Medicine/Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. Southern Ostrobothnia Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland. Härmä Rehabilitation Center, Ylihärmä, Finland. South Ostrobothnia Memory Association, Ylihärmä, Finland. City of Seinäjoki, Finland. Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. Joint Municipal Authority for North Karelia Social and Health Services (Siun Sote), Joensuu, Finland. Neuroepidemiology and Ageing Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Stockholms Sjukhem, Research & Development Unit, Stockholm, Sweden.

European journal of public health. 2021;(4):816-822

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Finnish Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability is a randomized controlled trial that has tested the efficacy of a multidomain intervention targeting modifiable risk factors to prevent cognitive impairment/dementia. A combination of healthy diet, physical, social and cognitive activity, and management of cardiovascular risks was shown to be an effective model to promote brain health among older people. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to implementing this lifestyle programme into health care. METHODS Four semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted among healthcare professionals working in primary care and in non-governmental organizations (N=27). Participants were asked to discuss their perceptions of facilitators and barriers for implementing the multidomain intervention into clinical practice. Interviews were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS Barriers and facilitators described by the healthcare professionals were related to infrastructure and resources, client's personal characteristics and the lifestyle intervention itself. These main categories included several sub-categories related to knowledge, motivation, resources, individualization and collaboration. The interviewees pointed out that more education on dementia prevention is needed, the work should be coordinated efficiently, resources to provide preventive health care should be adequate and multiprofessional collaboration is needed. CONCLUSIONS Transferring a lifestyle intervention from a trial-setting to real life requires knowledge about the factors that influence effective implementation. Identifying drivers and constraints of successful implementation helps to design and tailor future prevention programmes, increases motivation and adherence and supports system change.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Randomized Controlled Trial

Metadata